Age of Consent

[Jennifer]

I think the legal age of consent should be 35. :P

Oh, sorry, it was my religious reich side showing, huh?  heheh

[dezrtfish]

@Jennifer:

I think the legal age of consent should be 35. :P

Oh, sorry, it was my religious reich side showing, huh?  heheh

I think that would result in high prison rates and global war.

[Jennifer]

Hmm, okay Desert, how about if the age of consent was reduced to a biological level.  When a girl gets her first period she is old enough to consent and when a boy gets his first erection he is old enough to consent. :P

Bear in mind folks, I’m in favor of legallizing and taxing prostitution.

[Jermofoot]

@Jennifer:

Hmm, okay Desert, how about if the age of consent was reduced to a biological level.  When a girl gets her first period she is old enough to consent and when a boy gets his first erection he is old enough to consent. :P

What about dysmenorrhea?  Anorexics?  Women who’ve had their ovaries removed?  That means they might never get laid.
And you are in favor of male infants having sex?  You must be a NAMBLA card carrier.

[Guest]

If it’s hairy, then it’s ripe & ready.

[Jennifer]

Hey, I’m just pointing out that teh whole age of consent thing is arbitrarily determined by flawed human beings.  35 years old, 15 years old, really makes no difference, actually.  And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

[Janus1]

infants have been found to masturbate…for the record

[Jermofoot]

@Jennifer:

And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

Seriously…wtf does that mean?
What other types of erections are there?  Nonsexual ones?  Pffft…
I can’t believe I’m saying this - erections are for sexual purposes.  Period.

@Janus1:

infants have been found to masturbate…for the record

Yes, male and female, on their own.  My son can’t even understand me (or anybody), and found out about his special area all by himself.  It’s what they do.

[Guest]

@Jermofoot:

@Jennifer:

And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

Seriously…wtf does that mean?
What other types of erections are there?  Nonsexual ones?  Pffft…
I can’t believe I’m saying this - erections are for sexual purposes.  Period.Â

I have to admit Jermo, that was funny as hell!..…and true! Take notes Jennifer: whether we are 2 or 52, when that thang goes up we have a strong desire to insert it somewhere. When we are 2 we simply don’t have a clue of where it should go!

[Baghdaddy]

@Jennifer:

…. And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

LOL

They may not be able to ejaculate but you better believe they sure as heck enjoy playing with that thing!!!

[dezrtfish]

@Jennifer:

Hmm, okay Desert, how about if the age of consent was reduced to a biological level.  When a girl gets her first period she is old enough to consent and when a boy gets his first erection he is old enough to consent. :P

Bear in mind folks, I’m in favor of legallizing and taxing prostitution.

Well… I assumed you were joking about the 35 thing…

I don’t really remember my first morning wood, but I am pretty sure it was before I knew what to do with it.

By the way waiting until your 35 to have children drastically increases the risk of genetic abnormalities specifically Downs Syndrome.

Oh yeah, one more thing It’s another Girl, I just found out today.

[Guest]

Congrats!

[Jennifer]

@Baghdaddy:

@Jennifer:

…. And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

LOL

They may not be able to ejaculate but you better believe they sure as heck enjoy playing with that thing!!!

Obviously I’m not the most qualified person to talk to about the joys of playing with little richard and the twins.  However, I was informed by the pediatrician that infant erections are not sexual in nature they are just a method of the body ensuring that all the capilaries are functional.

[Guest]

Or it could be the baby smelled something fishy.

[Guest]

@Jennifer:

@Baghdaddy:

@Jennifer:

…. And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

LOL

They may not be able to ejaculate but you better believe they sure as heck enjoy playing with that thing!!!

Obviously I’m not the most qualified person to talk to about the joys of playing with little richard and the twins.  However, I was informed by the pediatrician that infant erections are not sexual in nature they are just a method of the body ensuring that all the capilaries are functional.

Are you sure?  Just wondering if you aren’t a Herm or anything. JK  :lol: LOL!

[Jermofoot]

@Scarface:

I have to admit Jermo, that was funny as hell!..…and true! Take notes Jennifer: whether we are 2 or 52, when that thang goes up we have a strong desire to insert it somewhere. When we are 2 we simply don’t have a clue of where it should go!

Some things never change.  :lol:

@dezrtfish:

Oh yeah, one more thing It’s another Girl, I just found out today.

Way to go, big Poppa!

@Jennifer:

Obviously I’m not the most qualified person to talk to about the joys of playing with little richard and the twins.  However, I was informed by the pediatrician that infant erections are not sexual in nature they are just a method of the body ensuring that all the capilaries are functional.

Well, that was a good laugh, but I doubt the claims of your pediatrician.  Physically, yes, it’s a matter of development since they can’t procreate, but there also is the matter of sexual development.  Think of it as the means and the will.

[Jennifer]

Mech, if I was a herm what would I need my husband for?  :-D

Jerm, you ever consider you were just a really sick and twisted boy and it really WAS just you?  Just checking.  Not saying it was just you, but have you ever considered that it might be?

[Jermofoot]

@Jennifer:

Jerm, you ever consider you were just a really sick and twisted boy and it really WAS just you?  Just checking.  Not saying it was just you, but have you ever considered that it might be?

What do you mean sick and twisted boy?  I don’t think I outgrew that…  :wink:

Seriously, I don’t think your doc was giving kids credit.  I’m sure there are some that never notice their tinker tankers, and some that probably never let go.

[Jennifer]

Honestly, I don’t think a 9 month old can even conceptualize what sexual pleasure is.  He can barely contemplate the difference between his butt is itching and he needs a new diaper and his stomach is empty and he wants the tit.  How is he going to understand the difference between the feeling of warm spitup on his chest and an erection in his pants?

[Jermofoot]

@Jennifer:

Honestly, I don’t think a 9 month old can even conceptualize what sexual pleasure is.  He can barely contemplate the difference between his butt is itching and he needs a new diaper and his stomach is empty and he wants the tit.  How is he going to understand the difference between the feeling of warm spitup on his chest and an erection in his pants?

It’s biology, baby.

When exactly does touching the peepee start to feel good?  Don’t you think that the pleasure cells are always there?