• '19 Moderator

    That sounds like experience…


  • That sounds like experience…

    Yea, this one time, after I watched this movie with some friends, we got a phone call, and all they said was “7 days”

    scared the hell out of us at the time, but that was almost a week ago…

  • 2007 AAR League

    @newpaintbrush:

    Because Japanese schoolgirls are the scariest stalkers in the world.

    Telling it like it is, bro.

    Very interesting liberty experience in Nagasaki back in '86.  Thankfully, cell phones and digital cameras were not invented yet.  That and I was living on base at the time, so it was hard for someone to come to my room unannounced.

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    I think the legal age of consent should be 35. :P

    Oh, sorry, it was my religious reich side showing, huh?  heheh

  • '19 Moderator

    @Jennifer:

    I think the legal age of consent should be 35. :P

    Oh, sorry, it was my religious reich side showing, huh?  heheh

    I think that would result in high prison rates and global war.

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    Hmm, okay Desert, how about if the age of consent was reduced to a biological level.  When a girl gets her first period she is old enough to consent and when a boy gets his first erection he is old enough to consent. :P

    Bear in mind folks, I’m in favor of legallizing and taxing prostitution.


  • @Jennifer:

    Hmm, okay Desert, how about if the age of consent was reduced to a biological level.  When a girl gets her first period she is old enough to consent and when a boy gets his first erection he is old enough to consent. :P

    What about dysmenorrhea?  Anorexics?  Women who’ve had their ovaries removed?  That means they might never get laid.
    And you are in favor of male infants having sex?  You must be a NAMBLA card carrier.


  • If it’s hairy, then it’s ripe & ready.

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    Hey, I’m just pointing out that teh whole age of consent thing is arbitrarily determined by flawed human beings.  35 years old, 15 years old, really makes no difference, actually.  And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.


  • infants have been found to masturbate…for the record


  • @Jennifer:

    And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

    Seriously…wtf does that mean?
    What other types of erections are there?  Nonsexual ones?  Pffft…
    I can’t believe I’m saying this - erections are for sexual purposes.  Period.

    @Janus1:

    infants have been found to masturbate…for the record

    Yes, male and female, on their own.  My son can’t even understand me (or anybody), and found out about his special area all by himself.  It’s what they do.


  • @Jermofoot:

    @Jennifer:

    And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

    Seriously…wtf does that mean?
    What other types of erections are there?  Nonsexual ones?  Pffft…
    I can’t believe I’m saying this - erections are for sexual purposes.  Period.Â

    I have to admit Jermo, that was funny as hell!..…and true! Take notes Jennifer: whether we are 2 or 52, when that thang goes up we have a strong desire to insert it somewhere. When we are 2 we simply don’t have a clue of where it should go!

  • 2007 AAR League

    @Jennifer:

    …. And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

    LOL

    They may not be able to ejaculate but you better believe they sure as heck enjoy playing with that thing!!!

  • '19 Moderator

    @Jennifer:

    Hmm, okay Desert, how about if the age of consent was reduced to a biological level.  When a girl gets her first period she is old enough to consent and when a boy gets his first erection he is old enough to consent. :P

    Bear in mind folks, I’m in favor of legallizing and taxing prostitution.

    Well… I assumed you were joking about the 35 thing…

    I don’t really remember my first morning wood, but I am pretty sure it was before I knew what to do with it.

    By the way waiting until your 35 to have children drastically increases the risk of genetic abnormalities specifically Downs Syndrome.

    Oh yeah, one more thing It’s another Girl, I just found out today.


  • Congrats!

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    @Baghdaddy:

    @Jennifer:

    …. And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

    LOL

    They may not be able to ejaculate but you better believe they sure as heck enjoy playing with that thing!!!

    Obviously I’m not the most qualified person to talk to about the joys of playing with little richard and the twins.  However, I was informed by the pediatrician that infant erections are not sexual in nature they are just a method of the body ensuring that all the capilaries are functional.


  • Or it could be the baby smelled something fishy.


  • @Jennifer:

    @Baghdaddy:

    @Jennifer:

    …. And infant boys do not have sexual erections, for the record.

    LOL

    They may not be able to ejaculate but you better believe they sure as heck enjoy playing with that thing!!!

    Obviously I’m not the most qualified person to talk to about the joys of playing with little richard and the twins.  However, I was informed by the pediatrician that infant erections are not sexual in nature they are just a method of the body ensuring that all the capilaries are functional.

    Are you sure?  Just wondering if you aren’t a Herm or anything. JK  :lol: LOL!


  • @Scarface:

    I have to admit Jermo, that was funny as hell!..…and true! Take notes Jennifer: whether we are 2 or 52, when that thang goes up we have a strong desire to insert it somewhere. When we are 2 we simply don’t have a clue of where it should go!

    Some things never change.  :lol:

    @dezrtfish:

    Oh yeah, one more thing It’s another Girl, I just found out today.

    Way to go, big Poppa!

    @Jennifer:

    Obviously I’m not the most qualified person to talk to about the joys of playing with little richard and the twins.  However, I was informed by the pediatrician that infant erections are not sexual in nature they are just a method of the body ensuring that all the capilaries are functional.

    Well, that was a good laugh, but I doubt the claims of your pediatrician.  Physically, yes, it’s a matter of development since they can’t procreate, but there also is the matter of sexual development.  Think of it as the means and the will.

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    Mech, if I was a herm what would I need my husband for?  :-D

    Jerm, you ever consider you were just a really sick and twisted boy and it really WAS just you?  Just checking.  Not saying it was just you, but have you ever considered that it might be?

Suggested Topics

Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

12

Online

17.7k

Users

40.3k

Topics

1.8m

Posts