This version is slightly different than the one I have.
No npc chart, setup. Spain neutral, neutral afrika = british, birma was one zone instead of 3.

What version is it then? :s

Very nice indeed.

Yes thats what I’m talking about. Design my own Battle Boards save to file and then get printed. Just need it were its protected from finger print smears and any other stuff.

Thank you YG and DK.

Bump

The final pieces have arrived. This gives me the option to go smaller when needed. Sometimes using the big pieces just adds to the cluster. As you can see the Monopoly U Build houses stack. As a house rule if you can afford all of them you get an indestructible Super Duper Major IC that smacks planes from the sky.

Picture 002.jpg
Picture 003.jpg
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb
Picture 002.jpg_thumb
Picture 003.jpg_thumb

I have made alterations, mostly to territory values along with adding a few new territories, to the Global 40 game to more accurately (as I believe) reflect the relative values of the given territories of the game map. Here is a list of my changes and/or additions;
United States (value 47)…… East US 20, Central US 12, West US 10, Alaska 2, Hawaii 1 & Philippines 2
Canada (value 11) …  NB & NS 1, Quebec 3, Ontario 3, A-S-M 2, British Columbia 2 & NWT (new territory north of A-S-M) 0.
ANZAC (value 6) … New Zealand 2, Queensland 1, New South Wales 2 & Victoria 1 (S. Aus, W. Aus & NT all now 0).
United Kingdom Europe (value 19) … Scotland 3, United Kingdom 6, Nigeria 1, Belgian Congo 1, Union of South Africa 2, Rhodesia 1, Tanganyika 1, Kenya 1, Anglo-Egyptian Sudan 1, Egypt 2 & Gold Coast, SW Africa & Trans-Jordan now 0.
France (value 19) … France 6, Normandy 2, South France 2, Algeria 1, Tunisia 1, Fr W Africa 1, Fr Cen Africa 1, Fr Equa Africa 1, Madagascar 1, Syria 1 & Fr Indo-china 2 (Morocco now 0).
Japan (value 26) … Japan 8, Okinawa 1, Iwo Jima 1, Korea 3, Formosa 1, Manchuria 3, Jehol 1, Shantung 2, Kiangsu 3, Kiangsi 1, Kwangsi 1 & Siam 1.
Germany (value 30) … Norway 1, Denmark 2, Hol-Bel 3, West Germany 9, G South Ger 3, Germany 5, Poland 3, Slo-Hun 2 & Romania 2.
United Kingdom (Pacific) (value 19) … West India 3, South India 1 (new)* , India 6, Burma 1, Malaya 3, Borneo 2 & Kwangtung(HK) 3 & Shan State now 0.
Italy (value 10) … North Italy 5, South Italy 3, Libya 1 & Ethiopia 1 (Albania now 0).
Dutch East Indies (value 7) … Java 4, Sumatra 2, Celebes 1 , Dutch New Guinea & Moluccas - a new territory, both 0.
Soviet Union (value 37) … Russia 6, Ukraine 3, West Ukraine 3, Novgorod 3, Baltic States 2, East Poland 2, Belarus 2, Rostov 2, Volgograd 2, Caucasus 2, Smolensk 1, Bryansk 1, Vologda 1, Samara 1, Tambov 1, Kazachstan 1, Novosibirsk 1, Yenisey 1, Yakut 1 & Amur 1. All other territories are now 0.
Neutral States (value 39) … Mexico 1, SE Mexico 2, Central America 1, West Indies 1, Venezuela 2, Columbia 1 (new), Peru 1 (new), Chile 2, Argentina 2, Brazil 3, Finland 1, Sweden 3, Eire 1 (new), Spain 2, Portugal 1, Angola 1, Mozambique 1, Saudi Arabia 1, Iraq 2, Turkey 3, Greece 2, Bulgaria 1, Yugoslavia 2 & Persia 2.

Maybe someone else will alter their game boards to these values. They are more accurate (relatively speaking) than what is presented by the game developers.

Any customization is welcome on this thread.

Your other question would probably go in one or two places.

You can either ask your question on the thread, "other axis and allies variants, "  or the thread, "house rules, " which might be a better place for it.

That would be my guess, but others may have suggestions as well.

I hope that helps. :-)

John

Very cool looking table. Cant wait to see you play a game on it.

I suppose that would be a fair analogy

Very nice work. I’m way too unsteady of hand and mind to pull that off.

It goes like this. Have a war for a few years, play Acquire for a few decades, then have another war. The time of course is relative and scale down for the game. Each game should take just over a month.

Dont know sorry.

By the way, the pictures here…

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=32700.0

…will give you an idea of what the acrylic sheet looks like, both on and off the map.  In some of pictures (click on them to expand them) you’ll see the removed sheet at the top of the photos.

Counting TUV, expected losses after a variety of round 1 openers, KJF and KGF both need some viability the additional russian units are necessary for an even remote possibility of KJF, assuming a 6-9 bid for the allies.

A heavily stacked axis map needed more to it going on many fronts. Kept the fun and minus the complete devastation. UK can sink Japan fleet by east indies with a sub bid and an infantry on egypt, the KJF becomes viable, at the same time, japan quickly catches up in income and can knock out india if it gets no support.

Lots of Russian players like to do ukraine, the added artillery smooths it out, Germany has plenty to counter attack no problem, nothing drastic. Taking london with tech roll LRA on round 1 non sense is out of the picture, tech players rejoice, as if LRA is germany is not devastating enough, plus even a carrier in baltic seazone and air on france… forces a huge turtle buy from uk, mitigating some of that still makes the baltic fleet thing strong just not so overwhelming. Basically all the germany strategies need some kind of drawback or investment. Like you should have to work for Africa if you want it instead of just getting it. The high risk high reward battles still there, because it comes under the assumption of an allies bid, even if you play without one there is still something for the allies to look forward to.

One of the key reasons this map is seldom played is because the allies really have nothing to look forward to for the first 3 rounds. So this just addresses that issue, it is still an axis favored map, the allies still have to make something happen, it is just they now have the tools to try to do something.

The germany destroyer may get removed, I added it to make germany 1 a bit more dynamic instead of linear. Players would also send 2 subs to sink usa transports, baltic subs to sink uk bship, go for egypt or protect bship at gibraltar, it is all the same stuff, now you can yolo attack usa and have a pretty even fight, block usa from landing africa, 2 sub sink uk dd trans and 1 dd to hit the cruiser or use dd to sink bship sub from russia, there is more decision making.

TL:DR More decision making for the axis instead of “this is the best option so I got to do this or I can risk this purchase if it does not work out oh well there will be no punishment anyway.”

It seems clear which style is more effective.  :-D

(Just kidding, but who doesn’t enjoy the occasional dig at the French?)

@Tall:

YG,

@Young:

Do you have more pics Tall Paul?
––Was there something in particular you wanted to see? Otherwise, here’s a link for ALL:
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=29550.0

Tall Paul

––Ooops, I had a typo in the link.

There have been a few threads where some ideas roughly along those lines (chiefly involving Risk-style free-for-all games) were discussed:

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=35995.0

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=34982.0

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=33016.0

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=26662.0

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=26758.0

@IWillNeverGrowUp:

@Young:

@IWillNeverGrowUp:

@Gen.:

��  �� Hi Young Grasshopper! Thanks for the National Objective cards. What a great idea so all of us will not forget any of our National Objective’s! Can you tell or show me these G40 Delta Deck you guys are talking about please? You really do add so much to this game sir! Thanks :-o

Look here -> http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=36011.0

The link James just provided is my National Objective deck (not available through artscow… sorry)

Here is a link to my Delta Deck house rule cards for the R&D phase (which is available through artscow)

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=33997.0

Aaaagh.  More coffee before linking next time.  :)

And … going to get those hosted on iwillnevergrowup.com soon!

That’s awesome, I have long future plans to make new and improved 2nd Editions for both these decks… FYI.

jwo1984 and others,

––This thread shows the SHAPEWAY Capitals, Air, and Naval Bases that were designed by Ebard. Enjoy.

Tall Paul

jwo1984 & Others,

––This thread shows how the Shipyard was made by Ebard re-designing his Dry Dock, adding a large wharf area, adding a second crane, several warehouses, storerooms, and supplies to the dock area including some pics of the finished painted units. Enjoy, and ask any other questions you might have.
––It Also shows his Small Naval Base and Air Base (straight) units.

Tall Paul